Article
28 March 2015

Follow up for urinary continence after pelvic organ prolapse repair

5

Article authors

George Kasyan
Nataliya V. Tupikina
M. Gvozdev
Dmitry Yu. Pushkar


Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Dept. of Urology, Moscow, Russia

Objective:

To evaluate the incidence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and anti-incontinence surgery for 6 months in patients after surgical correction of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) by the vaginal approach relative to the preoperative continence status.

Materials and methods:

This study included 82 women suffering from POP (cystocele grade 2-4 by POP-Q) who underwent transvaginal surgical repair. The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all patients provided signed informed consent. For evaluation of continence, the UDI-6 questionnaire was used. We found that 30 patients (group 1) had concomitant SUI and prolapse. The remaining patients without complaint of SUI were divided into 2 groups: group 2 (n=31) had a negative cough test after prolapse repositioning, and group 3 (n=21) had occult SUI. The results of surgical treatment of POP were evaluated for the presence SUI within 1, 3 and 6 months after the operation during office visits and using the UDI-6 questionnaire.

Results:

According to the survey performed after 1, 3 and 6 months of follow-up, we obtained the following results (Table 1). No cases of prolapse recurrence were noted during 6 months. At 1 month after surgery, 28 (34% of 82) patients reported the presence of SUI, and 23 (82% of 28) of these patients reported that they were bothered by their condition (according to IIQ-7). The patients remained under observation for six months after surgery to determine the long-term results and further treatment strategy. In total, 34 (41.5%) of 82 patients noted the presence of stress urinary incontinence, and 24 patients (29% of 82, 70% of 34) were strongly disturbed by SUI. However, during the first three months, only 6 patients were re-operated. During the follow-up for the next 3 months (6 months of follow-up), there was a reduction in the complaints related to stress urinary incontinence for 3 patients, and in 7 cases, there was complete resolution of SUI.

Conclusion:

A three-month follow-up period is ideal for the assessment of continence function in patients with severe SUI, and this is the best time to perform anti-stress surgery. In cases with no severe SUI, the follow-up should be continued for up to 6 months or more.

Table 1. Results of follow-up for 6 months.

  1 month Dynamics  3 months  Dynamics  6 months 
Resolved SUI  Appeared SUI  Resolved SUI  Appeared SUI 
SUI 28 (34%) 4 10 34 (41%) 10 3 21 (27%)
Severe SUI 23 (28%) 3 4 24 (29%)  3 1 16
Number of re-operated patients 0     6     8

Acknowledgement:

The study was funded by the grant of The Ministry of Education and Science, project 14.132.21.1784

Download

Download article
Download additional files

Tags: Deputy, Deputy, Deputy